European Commission
EuroTB
Surveillance of tuberculosis
World Health Organization
[ menu ] [ previous page ]  

6. Conclusion

The results of this two-year surveillance provide an improved picture of the epidemiological situation of tuberculosis in Europe compared to previous reports. Since 1995, consensus recommendations on uniform reporting of tuberculosis [3,4], including a common case definition and a common set of variables to be collected, have been approved. In 1996, the European definition of a notifiable case of tuberculosis was almost universally used, but differential inclusion of some population groups (e.g. illegal immigrants, prisoners) and some categories of patients (e.g. recurrent cases), together with variable rates of underreporting, may have introduced some biases in the comparisons between countries. The availability and completeness of information differed between countries. In particular, the quality of the bacteriological information appeared to vary greatly [10]. Information on culture is essential in order to validate case reporting since culture is currently the gold standard for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Europe. Information on smear results is also essential since sputum smear positivity is the best indicator of the infectiousness of a case. Inclusion of high quality bacteriological information would be best achieved by incorporating laboratories in the national notification schemes, as recommended [3,4].

So far, only a few countries have been able to implement all the European recommendations. Several countries have partially applied these recommendations and others are planning to do so in the near future. Substantial improvements in the number of variables collected and in the completeness of information can already be observed in 1996 compared with the previous year. Future changes in tuberculosis surveillance systems will further improve the quality and the comparability of data.Contrasting pictures emerge from data on tuberculosis cases notified in 1995 and 1996 in Europe, with large between-country variations. As in 1995, countries with a lower notification rate in 1996 are mostly situated in the western part of Europe (exceptions being Israel and the Czech Republic). Most countries reporting more than 20 cases per 100 000 in 1996 are situated in the eastern part of Europe with the notable exception of Spain and Portugal. Between 1995 and 1996, notification rates appear to have declined or to have stabilised in most countries with a lower notification rate, while increases were observed in many countries with a higher rate. This has resulted in a widening gap between the two groups. Moreover, the higher the notification rate in 1995, the larger the increase in 1996, as observed in many republics of the former USSR.It is difficult to interpret trends over only two years. However, these trends tend to confirm some of the changes already observed in the late 1980s and early 1990s after decades of continuing decreases in tuberculosis morbidity and mortality. In western Europe[11], the notification rate decreased regularly between 1974 and 1986, but stabilised or increased between 1986 and1990 in several countries (Austria, Denmark, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, United Kingdom). However, between 1990 and 1995, while increases were observed in some other countries, there was no confirmation of a clear increase in incidence in all western Europe: notifications increased only temporarily (over 2 to 5 years) or appeared to remain fairly stable in most countries. In eastern Europe [12], tuberculosis mortality and morbidity also declined regularly until 1985-1990. Substantial increases in notification rates were observed between 1990 and 1995 in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and in most republics of the former USSR, including the Baltic States. This reversal of trends was not confirmed in other countries (e.g. the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia), where notification rates continued to decline.HIV infection has not been a major factor in contributing to increases in tuberculosis notification rates, except for a few countries such as France, Portugal and Spain [13]. Since 1996, declining trends in AIDS incidence have resulted in a decreasing number of AIDS-associated tuberculosis cases in most western European countries, except in Portugal [14]. However, the rapidly emerging epidemic of HIV infections in countries such as Ukraine or the Russian Federation represents a serious threat since its impact on the incidence of tuberculosis could be substantial in the near future. Patients of foreign origin account for a highly variable proportion of tuberculosis patients in Europe. In 1996, they accounted for more than 50% of the cases in some western European countries. Although no significant variation in this proportion was observed between 1995 and 1996, the recent influx of immigrants from countries with a higher incidence of tuberculosis clearly had an important influence on the epidemiology of the disease. This is reflected by the substantial proportion of patients originating from Somalia, Yugoslavia or Bosnia-Herzegovina, who probably immigrated fairly recently.Impoverishment of subgroups of the population, particularly in big cities, may be an important factor in contributing to recent increases in tuberculosis incidence, particularly if access to health care is decreased for these subgroups. Disruption of health services due to war or economical and political difficulties is also likely to have a major influence on the epidemiology of tuberculosis. Indeed, delays in diagnosis and treatment and inadequacies or interruptions of therapy result in increased transmission of tuberculosis infection and high rates of relapse. Deterioration of tuberculosis control programmes is probably also responsible for the high prevalences of multi-drug resistance which were recently reported in several European countries (e.g. Estonia, Latvia, Russian Federation) [15]. In the perspective of working towards the elimination of tuberculosis in Europe [16], the surveillance of tuberculosis notifications should be complemented by the surveillance of drug resistance and the monitoring of treatment outcome [17].EuroTB plans to extend the European surveillance system in the coming year to include the surveillance of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance.


[ menu ] [ previous page ]